Claims

Control teachers held generally favorable viewpoints toward the visuals in the original CMP2 books, including math-irrelevant visuals

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Control teachers gave generally favorable ratings to labeling, color coding, spatial contiguity, and the inclusion of decorative and representational visuals in the original CMP2 books. → Clinton 2015

Evidence

Clinton 2015

Clinton, V. & Cooper, J.L. (2015, April). Teacher Viewpoints of Instructional Design Principles for Visuals in a Middle School Math Curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED574965

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Survey of control teachers in the RCT (21 of 55 responded), rating original CMP2 visuals on a 1-7 Likert scale shown in Figure 1. The article reports they "gave generally favorable ratings" with no effect size printed.

"They gave generally favorable ratings to the use of labeling, color coding, and spatial contiguity in the visuals. Control teachers also generally liked the inclusion of math-irrelevant visuals, whether decorative or representational."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.