Claims

Converger students earn significantly higher final course grades in synchronous online engineering graphics instruction than Converger face-to-face students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Converger students in the synchronous online group scored significantly higher on final grades than Converger students in the face-to-face group (Z = -2.324; p < .05). → Goodridge 2017

Evidence

Goodridge 2017

Goodridge, W. H., Lawanto, O., & Santoso, H. B. (2017). A Learning Style Comparison between Synchronous Online and Face-to-Face Engineering Graphics Instruction. International Education Studies, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n2p1

q2 · i? · causal · r2

A quasi-experimental comparison of six sections of an engineering graphics course (30 synchronous online, 78 face-to-face) taught by the same instructor with identical curricula. Mann-Whitney tests showed "significantly higher score on their final grades" for synchronous online Convergers, with Z = -2.324; p < .05. No effect size was printed.

"Converger students in the synchronous online group showed a significantly higher score on their final grades than the Converger students in the face-to-face group (Z = -2.324; p < .05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.