Added cooperation prompts helped disagreeing pairs of children choose together¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Adding questions such as "Can you two talk first and choose one for me?" helped a pair who had each repeated their own choice reach agreement. → Yanghee Kim 2021

Evidence¶

Yanghee Kim 2021¶

Yanghee Kim, Sherry Marx, Hung Viet Pham, Tung Nguyen. (2021). Designing for robot-mediated interaction among culturally and linguistically diverse children. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10051-2

q2 · i? · design · r3

In the ethnographic session data, a Latinx boy and white girl who initially repeated their own gendered choices ended the exchange agreeing on "Optimus Prime" after the robot asked whether the two could talk first and choose one.

"The following example shows that these prompts helped another pair of children, a white girl (GWLO) and a Latinx boy (BLEX), to agree on a toy for Skusie's friend."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Pre-written prompts increase Justifications and Alternative ideas in children's pair-programming talk and shift the role of Simple questions — related
• The intervention increased students' elaborated explanations and cumulative and exploratory talk — related
• Peer Discussion Improves Conceptual Understanding — related