The effect of cooperative learning differs by the location of the meta-analysis studies, with single-country studies showing higher effects than mixed-country studies¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Location significantly moderated the effect (Q(3)=24.18, p<.01): China ES=2.03, Türkiye ES=.93, other countries ES=.80, mixed ES=.61. → Öztürk 2023
Evidence¶
Öztürk 2023¶
Öztürk, B. (2023). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Models on Learning Outcomes: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, V18, N3. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.600.13
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2
Moderator analysis grouping the 23 meta-analyses by research location. The between-groups test was significant, "Q (3) = 24.18 p<.01"; mixed-country meta-analyses averaged ES=.61, lower than single-country studies.
"The effect of cooperative learning on students’ learning outcomes differs according to the locations of meta-analysis studies (Q (3) = 24.18 p<.01). The average effect sizes of the meta-analysis studies with Chine locus were relatively high (ES=2.03). The average effect sizes of meta-analysis studies covering Türkiye and other countries (Indonesia and Iran) are high (ES=.93 ES=.80, respectively)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The effect of cooperative learning did not differ statistically by teaching style, outcome type, publication quality, bias status, or report type — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Cooperative learning models have a moderate average effect on student learning outcomes across 23 first-order meta-analyses — a broader claim this one bears on
- Students rated peers' work from their own country 3.6% higher than work from elsewhere — related
- Meta-analysis offers additional strengths of increased statistical power, moderator analyses, and model testing — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cooperative-learning-location-moderator |
title |
The effect of cooperative learning differs by the location of the meta-analysis studies, with single-country studies showing higher effects than mixed-country studies |
description |
The effect of cooperative learning differs by the location of the meta-analysis studies, with single-country studies showing higher effects than mixed-country studies |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — öztürk-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.