Cooperative learning has a small, positive, significant effect on attitudes towards mathematics (d++ = 0.16)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr1·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i0 Across the studies measuring attitudes, the combined effect size of cooperative learning on attitudes towards mathematics was small (d+ = 0.16; n = 10 comparisons). → Gulfer Capar 2015
Evidence¶
Gulfer Capar 2015¶
Gulfer Capar, Kamuran Tarim. (2015). Efficacy of the Cooperative Learning Method on Mathematics Achievement and Attitude: A Meta-Analysis Research. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.2.2098
q3 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r1
Random-effects synthesis of the attitude comparisons included in the meta-analysis; the article reports the general effect size was "low ( d+ = 0.16; n = 10)". The abstract describes the attitude effect as small, positive, and significant.
"When the effect of cooperative learning on attitudes towards mathematics was taken into consideration, it was seen that the general effect size was low ( d+ = 0.16; n = 10)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Cooperative learning produces a medium, positive, significant effect on mathematics achievement compared with traditional methods (d++ = 0.59) — related
- No significant relative pre–post changes for attitudes toward collaborative learning, overall teamwork, or remaining teamwork subscales — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.