Claims

One of four qualifying studies found significant positive ITED outcomes for Core-Plus Mathematics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On the ITED math subscale, one out of four qualifying studies found significant positive outcomes for Core-Plus Mathematics students. → Core-Plus Mathematics evidence review 2019

Evidence

Core-Plus Mathematics evidence review 2019

Core-Plus Mathematics evidence review. (2019). https://www.coreplusmath.org

q2 · i? · review · r?

Evidence review of the qualifying studies, in which students were tested each year on a math subscale of the Iowa Test of Educational Development focusing on mathematical thinking and problem solving. The review reports that "one out of four studies found significant positive outcomes."

"On the ITED, one out of four studies found significant positive outcomes but this was sufficient to qualify Core-Plus Mathematics for the “Moderate” category."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id core-plus-one-of-four-studies-significant
title One of four qualifying studies found significant positive ITED outcomes for Core-Plus Mathematics
description One of four qualifying studies found significant positive ITED outcomes for Core-Plus Mathematics
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — core-plus-mathematics-evidence-review-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.