Claims

CORI students outperformed SI and TI comparison students on standardized reading tests and were rated higher in reading motivation, in quasi-experimental studies with large effect sizes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · theoretical r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 In Study 2, teachers rated CORI students higher in reading self-efficacy, intrinsic reading motivation, and extrinsic reading motivation than SI teachers rated their students (effect sizes 0.95, 1.29, 1.28). → Linnenbrink-Garcia 2026 q3 i? In Study 1, CORI students reported higher reading motivation, used reading strategies more, and had higher reading comprehension on project-created measures relative to SI students. → Linnenbrink-Garcia 2026 (2)

Evidence

Linnenbrink-Garcia 2026

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Wigfield, A., Cabrera, L., Mouzaoir, S., McKinney, D., Liu, P. P., Marchand, G., Schmidt, J. A., Harris, C. J., & Guthrie, J. (2026). The Case for Multifaceted, Integrative Motivation Interventions Embedded in Classrooms. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10177-w

q3 · i3 · theoretical · r3

Same Study 2 quasi-experimental comparison: teacher ratings favored CORI students over SI students on three motivational measures, "effect sizes 0.95, 1.29, and 1.28, respectively" — substantially above the average effect sizes Lazowski and Hulleman reported.

"teachers rated their students as higher in reading self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation in reading, and extrinsic motivation in reading than did the SI teachers (effect sizes 0.95, 1.29, and 1.28, respectively)."

Linnenbrink-Garcia 2026 (2)

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Wigfield, A., Cabrera, L., Mouzaoir, S., McKinney, D., Liu, P. P., Marchand, G., Schmidt, J. A., Harris, C. J., & Guthrie, J. (2026). The Case for Multifaceted, Integrative Motivation Interventions Embedded in Classrooms. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10177-w

q3 · i? · theoretical · r3

Quasi-experimental matched group design (Study 1) comparing CORI with SI only. CORI students showed higher reading motivation, greater strategy use, and higher comprehension on project-created measures; no standardized test effect size is printed for this study.

"Results from Study 1 indicated that CORI students reported higher reading motivation, made greater use of the reading strategies, and had higher reading comprehension (on project-created measures) relative to SI students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cori-outperformed-comparisons-reading
title CORI students outperformed SI and TI comparison students on standardized reading tests and were rated higher in reading motivation, in quasi-experimental studies with large effect sizes
description CORI students outperformed SI and TI comparison students on standardized reading tests and were rated higher in reading motivation, in quasi-experimental studies with large effect sizes
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — linnenbrink-garcia-2026, linnenbrink-garcia-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.