Claims

Experimental-group students reported satisfaction with corpus-based lexical teaching while finding some materials too challenging

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Open-ended interviews found experimental-group participants generally satisfied with the innovative lexical teaching approach, though some language materials were perceived as challenging. → Jing Shi 2017

Evidence

Jing Shi 2017

Jing Shi. (2017). Biting off More Than They Can Chew? The Impact of Pedagogical Application of Corpus on Vocabulary Ability of Intermediate-Level ESL Learners in Mainland China: A Quasi-Experimental Study. English Language Teaching, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n9p232

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative open-ended interviews conducted by the researcher after the posttest triangulated the quantitative results. Participant C noted the method "could easily get us involved" but that "some of the language materials are quite challenging for us and the materials need improvement."

"Participants in the experimental group, in general, are satisfied with the innovative approach of lexical teaching."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.