Correct-answer feedback alone was insufficient for generalization: significantly worse than lecture in Study 1, with the difference not significant in Study 2¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In Study 1's exploratory model, correct-response feedback was significantly less effective than lecture for generalization (.36 SD difference). → Michael W. Asher & Paulo F. Carvalho 2026
q3 i? In Study 2, correct-response feedback was 7 points less effective than lecture for generalization, but this was not significant. → Michael W. Asher & Paulo F. Carvalho 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Michael W. Asher & Paulo F. Carvalho 2026¶
Michael W. Asher & Paulo F. Carvalho. (2026). Conditions for Effective Learning Without Upfront Instruction: How Practice with Feedback Supports Memory, Generalization, Motivation, and Metacognition. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10103-6
q3 · i? · causal · r3
Study 1 exploratory regression using lecture as reference showed "correct-response feedback was significantly less effective at promoting generalization, t(291) = −2.69, p =.008, a.36 SD difference (39% vs. 27%)", moderated by confidence (b = −.09, p =.017), with lecture also ineffective for less-confident students.
"In the exploratory model comparing lecture to correct-response feedback, cor- rect-response feedback was significantly less effective at promoting generalization, t(291) = −2.69, p =.008, a.36 SD difference (39% vs. 27%)."
Michael W. Asher & Paulo F. Carvalho 2026 (2)¶
Michael W. Asher & Paulo F. Carvalho. (2026). Conditions for Effective Learning Without Upfront Instruction: How Practice with Feedback Supports Memory, Generalization, Motivation, and Metacognition. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10103-6
q3 · i? · causal · r3
Study 2's secondary model found correct-response feedback "7 points less effective at promoting generalization than lecture, although this effect was not significant in Study 2, t(294), p =.153". The direction replicated Study 1 but the test did not reach significance in the open-ended format.
"In the secondary model comparing lecture directly to correct-response feed- back, correct-response feedback was found to be 7 points less effective at promot- ing generalization than lecture, although this effect was not significant in Study 2, t(294), p =.153."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Practice with feedback—either correct-answer or explanatory—produces better memory than lecture, in both multiple-choice and open-ended formats — related
- Generalization from practice requires explanatory feedback and sufficient prior knowledge or confidence, with benefits concentrated among better-prepared learners — a broader claim this one bears on
- Learners judge explanatory feedback as more effective preparation than correct-response feedback, in both studies — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
correct-answer-feedback-insufficient-for-generalization |
title |
Correct-answer feedback alone was insufficient for generalization: significantly worse than lecture in Study 1, with the difference not significant in Study 2 |
description |
Correct-answer feedback alone was insufficient for generalization: significantly worse than lecture in Study 1, with the difference not significant in Study 2 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-19 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — michael-w-asher-paulo-f-carvalho-2026, michael-w-asher-paulo-f-carvalho-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.