Self-reported learning gains and correlational analyses suggest interrelations among second-order and strategy knowledge, epistemological beliefs, explanation ability, topic knowledge, and interest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Self-reports on learning gains and correlational analysis were used to explore how the measured constructs interrelate. → Stoel 2017
Evidence¶
Stoel 2017¶
Stoel, G.L., van Drie, J.P., & van Boxtel, C.A.M. (2017). The effects of explicit teaching of strategies, second-order concepts, and epistemological underpinnings on students' ability to reason causally in history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000143
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Exploratory correlational analysis supplementing the experiment, examining "the interrelatedness of second-order and strategy knowledge, epistemological beliefs, student's ability to construct a causal explanation, topic knowledge, and individual interest"; no coefficients are printed in the available text.
"Furthermore, self-reports on learning gains and correlational analysis were applied to explore the interrelatedness of second-order and strategy knowledge, epistemological beliefs, student's ability to construct a causal explanation, topic knowledge, and individual interest"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Epistemic Beliefs — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Interest — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Reflective thinking dimensions correlate positively with learning process/expert knowledge, and most correlate positively with learning effort and negatively with innate/fixed ability and certainty of knowledge — related
- Explicit teaching shows no effect on students' first-order (topic) knowledge in history — related
- Explicit teaching increases students' endorsement of criterialist epistemological beliefs about history — related
- Explicit teaching does not improve overall quality of written causal explanations but improves use of second-order language and causal connections — related
- Knowledge gains correlate positively with belief change, more strongly for higher relational-understanding levels — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
correlational-interrelatedness-history-reasoning-constructs |
title |
Self-reported learning gains and correlational analyses suggest interrelations among second-order and strategy knowledge, epistemological beliefs, explanation ability, topic knowledge, and interest |
description |
Self-reported learning gains and correlational analyses suggest interrelations among second-order and strategy knowledge, epistemological beliefs, explanation ability, topic knowledge, and interest |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — stoel-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.