Claims

Learning number symbols from multiple concrete representations carries a cost compared with consistent single representations, whether concrete or abstract

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across three experiments, children learning from multiple concrete representations performed worse on symbolic comparison than those learning from a single consistent representation. → Amy Bennett 2018

Evidence

Amy Bennett 2018

Amy Bennett, Matthew Inglis and Camilla Gilmore. (2018). The Cost of Multiple Representations: Learning Number Symbols with Abstract and Concrete Representations. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000318

q3 · i? · causal · r2

The general discussion synthesises the three experiments: multiple concrete representations, the dominant format in children's number books, produced lower symbolic comparison accuracy than either consistent concrete or consistent abstract representations in each experiment. No summary effect size is printed.

"Overall, we found that there is a cost to multiple representations. Learning number symbols from multiple concrete representations – the approach adopted by the majority of children's number books (Ward et al., 2016) – seems to be less effective than learning from a consistent concrete representation or a consistent abstract representation"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cost-of-multiple-concrete-representations
title Learning number symbols from multiple concrete representations carries a cost compared with consistent single representations, whether concrete or abstract
description Learning number symbols from multiple concrete representations carries a cost compared with consistent single representations, whether concrete or abstract
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — amy-bennett-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.