Claims

Learning deficits in math/science were larger than in other subjects (about 0.17 SD smaller achievement)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Student achievement in math/science is on average 0.17 standard deviations smaller than in humanities/subject mix. → Di Pietro Giorgio 2023

Evidence

Di Pietro Giorgio 2023

Di Pietro Giorgio. (2023). The impact of Covid-19 on student achievement: Evidence from a recent meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100530

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-regression (WLS weighted by inverse standard error, 239 estimates) with study-level clustered standard errors; the Math/Science coefficient is −0.170*** relative to the humanities reference category, a printed regression coefficient rather than a standardised effect size.

"student achievement in math/science is on average found to be 0.17 standard deviations smaller than in humanities/subject mix."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id covid-learning-deficit-larger-math-science
title Learning deficits in math/science were larger than in other subjects (about 0.17 SD smaller achievement)
description Learning deficits in math/science were larger than in other subjects (about 0.17 SD smaller achievement)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — di-pietro-giorgio-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.