Claims

Cowan's three-factor embedded processes model fit young children's working memory data slightly better than Baddeley and Hitch's three-factor model and decisively better than Baddeley's four-factor episodic buffer model

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In confirmatory factor analyses of 13 working memory tasks in 168 children aged 7-9, the Cowan embedded processes model showed better fit on all indices than the Baddeley and Hitch three-factor model, including an AIC 6 points lower. → Gray Shelley 2016 q3 i? Baddeley's four-factor model including an episodic buffer failed to fit because the episodic buffer factor was empirically indistinguishable from the visuospatial sketchpad factor, with an out-of-bounds correlation of 1.08. → Gray Shelley 2016 (2)

Evidence

Gray Shelley 2016

Gray Shelley, Green Samuel, Alt Mary, Hogan Tiffany P., Kuo Trudy, Brinkley Shara, Cowan Nelson. (2016). The Structure of Working Memory in Young Children and Its Relation to Intelligence. Journal of Memory and Language. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5157932/

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Confirmatory factor analysis comparing three working memory models in 168 children aged 7-9 with typical development. Both models evidenced good fit, but "the Cowan model showed better fit on all fit indices," with the AIC 6 points lower for the Cowan model.

"As shown in the top part of Table 5, both the Cowan embedded process model and the Baddeley and Hitch (1974) models evidenced good fit. However, the Cowan model showed better fit on all fit indices. For example, the AIC was 6 points lower for the Cowan embedded process model than for the Baddeley and Hitch model."

Gray Shelley 2016 (2)

Gray Shelley, Green Samuel, Alt Mary, Hogan Tiffany P., Kuo Trudy, Brinkley Shara, Cowan Nelson. (2016). The Structure of Working Memory in Young Children and Its Relation to Intelligence. Journal of Memory and Language. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5157932/

q3 · i? · associational · r2

CFA of Baddeley's four-component model in the same sample. The correlation between the visuospatial sketchpad and episodic buffer factors was 1.08, an out-of-bounds estimate, showing "an episodic buffer factor is empirically indistinguishable from the visuospatial sketch pad factor."

"The Baddeley four-component model converged to solution, but the correlation between the visuospatial sketch pad factor and the episodic buffer factor was 1.08, an out-of-bounds estimate. These results indicate that an episodic buffer factor is empirically indistinguishable from the visuospatial sketch pad factor."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cowan-embedded-processes-model-best-fit-young-children
title Cowan's three-factor embedded processes model fit young children's working memory data slightly better than Baddeley and Hitch's three-factor model and decisively better than Baddeley's four-factor episodic buffer model
description Cowan's three-factor embedded processes model fit young children's working memory data slightly better than Baddeley and Hitch's three-factor model and decisively better than Baddeley's four-factor episodic buffer model
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — gray-shelley-2016, gray-shelley-2016-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.