Claims

CPS-ALM instruction produces greater statistical self-concept enhancement (medium category, N-gain 0.33) than expository learning (low category, N-gain 0.16)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The CPS-ALM group achieved a self-concept N-gain of 0.33 (medium category) versus 0.16 (low category) for the EL group, a statistically significant difference. → Takaria. J 2016

Evidence

Takaria. J 2016

Takaria. J, Rumahlatu. D. (2016). The Effectiveness of CPS-ALM Model in Enhancing Statistical Literacy Ability and Self Concept of Elementary School Student Teacher. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1115857

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Self-concept was measured with a self-concept scale (SCS) covering conceptual and attitude components, pre and post. A Mann-Whitney U test on N-gain (Table 2: U = 122,000, Z = -5,761, Sig. 1-tailed = 0.000) showed the CPS-ALM group's " average score of (0.33)" exceeded the EL group's 0.16. No standardized effect size is printed.

"Related with student’s statistical self-concept, it is identified that there is difference in student’ s self-concept enhancement between CPS-ALM group and EL gr oup, in which CPS-ALM group achieve average score of (0.33) which is in medium category whereas EL group achieve (0.16) which is in low category."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.