Claims

CSCL workshop participants concluded that building a single shared CSCL paradigm was neither feasible nor desirable, favoring maintained paradigm diversity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across small-group and panel discussions at the 2025 ISLS workshop, participants rejected the goal of a single CSCL paradigm and instead endorsed maintaining paradigm diversity in the field. → Simon 2026

Evidence

Simon 2026

Simon, S., Şener, B., Greisel, M., Pifarré Turmo, M., Borchers, C., Chernikova, O., Shahrokhian, B., Tajik, E., Sitjà Martín, M., Čarapina, M., Hu, X., & Ataş, A. H. (2026). Toward a Taxonomy: Insights from the 2025 CSCL paradigm building workshop. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-026-09477-8

q2 · i? · qualitative · r1

Qualitative outcome of the on-site third workshop group and panel discussion at ISLS 2025, reconstructed from the shared slide deck and participants' memories. Consensus was that "the challenge is to maintain paradigm diversity in the field" rather than adopt one paradigm.

"The previous sections and discussions evidenced consensus across groups and the panel that, instead of aligning CSCL to a normal science with a single paradigm, the challenge is to maintain paradigm diversity in the field."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cscl-paradigm-building-deemed-infeasible-2025-workshop
title CSCL workshop participants concluded that building a single shared CSCL paradigm was neither feasible nor desirable, favoring maintained paradigm diversity
description CSCL workshop participants concluded that building a single shared CSCL paradigm was neither feasible nor desirable, favoring maintained paradigm diversity
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — simon-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.