Cooperating teachers who experienced the Clinical Supervision Model rated their university supervisors significantly higher than cooperating teachers under the traditional system¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? CTs in the experimental group gave significantly higher overall satisfaction ratings to their university supervisors than CTs in the control group (Mann-Whitney U = 774.500, p < .001). → Gürsoy 2016

Evidence¶

Gürsoy 2016¶

Gürsoy, E., Kesner, J. E., & Salihoglu, U. M. (2016). Clinical Supervision Model in Teaching Practice: Does it Make a Difference in Supervisors' Performance?. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(11). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n11.5

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Nonparametric comparison of CT supervisor-satisfaction surveys (12 Likert-type items, Cronbach's alpha .98) between experimental (n=108 CTs) and control (n=32 CTs) groups. The article reports a statistically significant difference favoring the experimental group; no effect size is printed.

"Similarly, the Mann-Whitney U test for the CTs evaluations of the US revealed statistically significant differences in the overall rating of the US, U=774.500, p< .001. Cooperating teachers who were a part of the experimental group had on average, a higher evaluation score of the US."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Teacher trainees who experienced the Clinical Supervision Model rated their university supervisors significantly higher than trainees under the traditional system — related
• Trainees exposed to the Clinical Supervision Model developed more critical, better-justified evaluations of supervision quality than control-group trainees — related