Schools using the CSTAG model show fewer disciplinary infractions, suspensions, expulsions, and law enforcement actions than schools using general threat assessment approaches¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Comparative studies find fewer disciplinary infractions, suspensions, expulsions, and law enforcement actions in CSTAG schools than in general-approach schools, particularly for students of color and students with disabilities. → DePaoli 2025
Evidence¶
DePaoli 2025¶
DePaoli, J. L., & Loewe, S. B. (2025). Keeping schools safe? The research on behavioral threat assessments. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/808.437
q2 · i? · review · r3
The report's synthesis of comparison-group outcome studies states that "studies also find evidence of fewer disciplinary infractions, suspensions, expulsions, and law enforcement actions in schools using the CSTAG model than in those using a general threat assessment approach." No effect sizes are printed.
"studies also find evidence of fewer disciplinary infractions, suspensions, expulsions, and law enforcement actions in schools using the CSTAG model than in those using a general threat assessment approach, particularly for students of color and students with disabilities"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Randomized studies, as reviewed, find that students who make threats in CSTAG schools more often receive counseling and less often long-term suspension or transfer, with the largest changes in higher-fidelity schools — related
- CSTAG training shifts staff knowledge and beliefs, improving threat-assessment accuracy and reducing support for zero-tolerance policies — related
- Exclusionary discipline disproportionately affects students of color from low-income families and students with disabilities, who receive harsher penalties than peers for similar behaviors — related
- Exclusionary discipline harms students and disproportionately affects students of color, so tracking suspension data can promote positive interventions — related
- Exclusionary discipline disproportionately removes students of color and students with disabilities from school — related
- Students of color and students with disabilities are disproportionately suspended and referred to law enforcement relative to their enrollment — related
- Black students and students with disabilities are disproportionately referred for behavioral threat assessments — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cstag-fewer-exclusionary-discipline-than-general-approach |
title |
Schools using the CSTAG model show fewer disciplinary infractions, suspensions, expulsions, and law enforcement actions than schools using general threat assessment approaches |
description |
Schools using the CSTAG model show fewer disciplinary infractions, suspensions, expulsions, and law enforcement actions than schools using general threat assessment approaches |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — depaoli-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.