The type of CT measure employed (standardized vs. non-standardized; item format) influences evaluation of intervention effectiveness¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? 93% of studies employing non-standardized CT measures reported significant improvement, versus 55% of studies employing standardized measures. → Dawit T. Tiruneh 2014
Evidence¶
Dawit T. Tiruneh 2014¶
Dawit T. Tiruneh, An Verburgh & Jan Elen. (2014). Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Instruction in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies. Higher Education Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/hes.v4n1p1
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's comparison of CT outcomes across its 33 studies (Appendix D) reports non-standardized researcher-made measures were associated with significant improvement more frequently (93%) than standardized measures (55%). Items plausibly related to instruction tasks may explain the difference.
"Studies which employed th e non-standardized CT meas ures reported significant improvement on the posttest or between the experimental and control conditions more frequently (93% of the studies) than the standardized CT measures (55% of th e studies)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
-
Direct CT instruction combined with modeling, coaching, and discussion yields more consistent CT improvement than implicit teaching strategies — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
ITS evaluation results depend strongly on test type: effects are large on locally developed tests (ES = 0.73) and small on standardized tests (ES = 0.13) — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Language and early writing interventions showed larger effects on researcher-developed than standardized outcome measures, while phonological awareness, print knowledge, and decoding effects were comparable across measure types — related
- Proportions of significant CT gains vary by instructional approach, but approach alone does not determine effectiveness — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ct-measure-type-influences-effectiveness-evaluation |
title |
The type of CT measure employed (standardized vs. non-standardized; item format) influences evaluation of intervention effectiveness |
description |
The type of CT measure employed (standardized vs. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-14 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — dawit-t-tiruneh-2014 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.