Performance on practiced reasoning items and on transfer items continued to improve after 3-week and 9-month delays¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Learning-item performance improved from the 3-week delayed posttest (M = 53.30) to the 9-month delayed posttest (M = 63.00). → Lara M. van Peppen 2021
q3 i? Transfer-item performance was lower on the 3-week delayed test (M = 19.25) than the 9-month delayed test (M = 24.84). → Lara M. van Peppen 2021 (2)
Evidence¶
Lara M. van Peppen 2021¶
Lara M. van Peppen, Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen, Anita E. G. Heijltjes, Eva M. Janssen, Tamara van Gog. (2021). Enhancing students' critical thinking skills: is comparing correct and erroneous examples beneficial? Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09559-0
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Exploratory 2x4 mixed ANOVA on learning items for the Safety and Security Management subsample (N = 82) showed a main effect of Test Moment, F(1,78) = 21.36, p < .001, ηp² = .22, with no Practice Type effect or interaction.
"participants' performance improved from 3-week delayed posttest (M = 53.30, SE = 2.69) to 9-month delayed posttest (M = 63.00, SE = 2.24)"
Lara M. van Peppen 2021 (2)¶
Lara M. van Peppen, Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen, Anita E. G. Heijltjes, Eva M. Janssen, Tamara van Gog. (2021). Enhancing students' critical thinking skills: is comparing correct and erroneous examples beneficial? Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09559-0
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Exploratory 2x4 mixed ANOVA on transfer items (N = 82) showed a main effect of Test Moment, F(1,78) = 9.53, p = .003, ηp² = .11, with no Practice Type effect or interaction.
"participants performed lower on the 3-week delayed test (M = 19.25, SE = 1.60) than the 9-month delayed test (M = 24.84, SE = 1.67)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Explicit CT instruction combined with practice improves students' unbiased reasoning on instructed and practiced heuristics-and-biases items from pretest to immediate posttest — related
- Contrasting examples, correct examples, erroneous examples, and practice problems produced no differences in learning gains or transfer of unbiased-reasoning skills — related
- On a delayed assessment 1 to 3 months later, many students transferred their appreciation of variation to another context and could explain the meaning of variation — related
- Gains from an intensive period of second-language study persist for weeks without rehearsal. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ct-performance-improves-further-after-delay |
title |
Performance on practiced reasoning items and on transfer items continued to improve after 3-week and 9-month delays |
description |
Performance on practiced reasoning items and on transfer items continued to improve after 3-week and 9-month delays |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — lara-m-van-peppen-2021, lara-m-van-peppen-2021-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.