Claims

Performance on practiced reasoning items and on transfer items continued to improve after 3-week and 9-month delays

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Learning-item performance improved from the 3-week delayed posttest (M = 53.30) to the 9-month delayed posttest (M = 63.00). → Lara M. van Peppen 2021 q3 i? Transfer-item performance was lower on the 3-week delayed test (M = 19.25) than the 9-month delayed test (M = 24.84). → Lara M. van Peppen 2021 (2)

Evidence

Lara M. van Peppen 2021

Lara M. van Peppen, Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen, Anita E. G. Heijltjes, Eva M. Janssen, Tamara van Gog. (2021). Enhancing students' critical thinking skills: is comparing correct and erroneous examples beneficial? Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09559-0

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Exploratory 2x4 mixed ANOVA on learning items for the Safety and Security Management subsample (N = 82) showed a main effect of Test Moment, F(1,78) = 21.36, p < .001, ηp² = .22, with no Practice Type effect or interaction.

"participants' performance improved from 3-week delayed posttest (M = 53.30, SE = 2.69) to 9-month delayed posttest (M = 63.00, SE = 2.24)"

Lara M. van Peppen 2021 (2)

Lara M. van Peppen, Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen, Anita E. G. Heijltjes, Eva M. Janssen, Tamara van Gog. (2021). Enhancing students' critical thinking skills: is comparing correct and erroneous examples beneficial? Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09559-0

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Exploratory 2x4 mixed ANOVA on transfer items (N = 82) showed a main effect of Test Moment, F(1,78) = 9.53, p = .003, ηp² = .11, with no Practice Type effect or interaction.

"participants performed lower on the 3-week delayed test (M = 19.25, SE = 1.60) than the 9-month delayed test (M = 24.84, SE = 1.67)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ct-performance-improves-further-after-delay
title Performance on practiced reasoning items and on transfer items continued to improve after 3-week and 9-month delays
description Performance on practiced reasoning items and on transfer items continued to improve after 3-week and 9-month delays
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — lara-m-van-peppen-2021, lara-m-van-peppen-2021-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.