Claims

The intervention does not significantly change the total number of questions educators ask

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Total questions per hour showed no significant pre-post or group difference, and the interaction was not statistically significant. → Gul 2014

Evidence

Gul 2014

Gul, R. B., Khan, S., Ahmed, A., Cassum, S., Saeed, T., Parpio, Y., Profetto-McGrath, J., & Schopflocher, D. (2014). Enhancing Educators' Skills for Promoting Critical Thinking in Their Classroom Discourses: A Randomized Control Trial. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(1), 37-54. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Mixed between-within ANOVA in the same RCT of 72 educators. Descriptively, total questions per hour rose from 25.91 to 32.45 in the intervention group and fell from 33.17 to 24.43 in controls, but the "interaction effect F1,70 = 2.656, p = >0.05" was not statistically significant; equivalence was not tested.

"An ANOVA for the total number of questions showed no overall difference from the first to the second observation period (pre-post main effect F1,70 = .055, p > 0.05), and there was no overall difference between the intervention and control groups (between group main effect F1,70 = .005, p > 0.05)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.