Applying critical thinking aspects on the module makes an effective contribution of 64% to students' academic achievement enhancement¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The partial eta squared value of 0.640 is interpreted by the authors as a 64% effective contribution of the CTa module to achievement enhancement. → Wicaksana 2020

Evidence¶

Wicaksana 2020¶

Wicaksana, Y. D., Widoretno, S., & Dwiastuti, S. (2020). The Use of Critical Thinking Aspects on Module to Enhance Students’ Academic Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 303-314. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13221a

q3 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA of post-test scores (Table 7) reports Group F=90.562, p=0.000, partial eta squared 0.640; the authors interpret this as an "effective contribution of 0.64 or 64%". The printed effect size is partial eta squared = 0.640.

"The implementation of module which contains CTa made an effective contribution of 0.64 or 64% in improving students’ academic achievement of experimental group, according to partial eta squared value."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Using a module containing critical thinking aspects produces significantly higher academic achievement than the commonly used school module in 8th-grade human circulatory system learning — related
• The experimental group's average achievement enhancement (28.14 points) exceeded the control group's (19.27 points) despite a lower pre-test mean — related
• The CTa module reduces the academic achievement gap between students compared with the commonly used module — related