Claims

All Year 5 children in CU schools made better average progress than control-school children regardless of their actual level of participation in CU activities

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Further analyses suggested all Year 5 children in schools doing CU made better average progress than children in control schools, regardless of their actual level of participation in CU activities. → Stephen Gorard 2017

Evidence

Stephen Gorard 2017

Stephen Gorard, Nadia Siddiqui, Beng Huat See, Emma Smith, Patrick White. (2017). Children's University: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581159

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Secondary analysis comparing volunteer pupils who actually participated in CU with treatment-school volunteers who did not, alongside control volunteers. The report states progress was better "regardless of their actual level of participation in CU activities".

"Further analyses suggested that all Year 5 children in schools doing CU made better average progress than children in control schools, regardless of their actual level of participation in CU activities."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.