Kindergarten follow-up shows statistically significant positive effects of Curiosity Corner on two print knowledge measures, not included in the effectiveness rating¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 At kindergarten follow-up, the PCER trial found statistically significant effects favoring Curiosity Corner on TERA-3 (effect size 0.43) and WJ III Letter-Word Identification (effect size 0.43), but not on WJ III Spelling (0.20). → Curiosity Corner 2009
Evidence¶
Curiosity Corner 2009¶
Curiosity Corner. (2009). WWC Intervention Report, What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. https://www.successforall.org/early/early_curiosity.htm
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Kindergarten follow-up from the PCER Consortium (2008) randomized controlled trial (69 schools/188 kindergarteners on TERA-3). The table row reports mean difference 3.50, effect size 0.43, statistically significant, improvement index +17; WJ III Letter-Word Identification likewise 0.43, significant.
"TERA-3 Kindergarteners 69/188 nr nr 3.50 0.43 Statistically significant +17"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Alphabet Knowledge and Print Awareness — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Curiosity Corner shows no discernible effects on preschool print knowledge in the PCER randomized trial — related
- Curiosity Corner shows no discernible effects on preschool math outcomes in the PCER randomized trial — related
- Headsprout Early Reading has a statistically significant positive effect on the print knowledge of at-risk preschool children — related
- Curiosity Corner improves expressive language but not receptive language in a New Jersey cluster randomized study — related
- Curiosity Corner shows significant positive kindergarten follow-up effects on early reading and letter-word identification, averaging +0.27 — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- In the PCER study, Curiosity Corner showed non-significant positive effects on immediate reading and phonological measures — related
- Two cluster randomized experiments with 225 students rate Curiosity Corner as Promising with an average kindergarten follow-up effect of +0.33 — related
- REDI effects largely fade by end of kindergarten, with significant positive effects only on TOWRE Phonetic Decoding Efficiency — related
- Randomized trials of Success for All find significant positive impacts on K-2 early reading, strongest for students starting with lower achievement — related
- Early Reading First had positive, statistically significant impacts on children's print and letter knowledge — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
curiosity-corner-kindergarten-followup-print-gains |
title |
Kindergarten follow-up shows statistically significant positive effects of Curiosity Corner on two print knowledge measures, not included in the effectiveness rating |
description |
Kindergarten follow-up shows statistically significant positive effects of Curiosity Corner on two print knowledge measures, not included in the effectiveness rating |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2009 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — curiosity-corner-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.