Claims

Curriculum and assessment design factors, including modular structure, feedback timing, and overlap between consecutive assessments, are proposed to moderate feedback use

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Modular program structures can inhibit application of feedback to subsequent assessments, and long waits for feedback reduce engagement once it arrives. → Winstone 2017

Evidence

Winstone 2017

Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's narrative synthesis of context moderators, drawn almost exclusively from HE research. Taylor and Burke da Silva's (2014) survey found biology students reported the most-useable feedback, attributed to greater overlap between consecutive assessments; several contributions report an apparent consensus that long waits reduce engagement.

"This structure, some researchers argued, can inhibit learners' application of feedback to subsequent assessments (Holmes & Papageorgiou, 2009; Jonsson, 2013; Orsmond et al., 2005; Price et al., 2011)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id curriculum-design-moderates-feedback-use
title Curriculum and assessment design factors, including modular structure, feedback timing, and overlap between consecutive assessments, are proposed to moderate feedback use
description Curriculum and assessment design factors, including modular structure, feedback timing, and overlap between consecutive assessments, are proposed to moderate feedback use
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — winstone-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.