Nearly half of waiver states adopted a 'cut the gap in half' achievement goal, while only Arizona chose 100 percent proficiency by 2020¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2018: baselines and conditions change
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because a design page cites it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Nearly half of waiver states chose some version of the cut-the-gap-in-half achievement goal; only Arizona chose 100 percent proficiency by 2020 and Louisiana retained the NCLB 2014 goal. → Daria Hall 2013
Evidence¶
Daria Hall 2013¶
Daria Hall. (2013). A Step Forward or a Step Back? State Accountability in the Waiver Era. The Education Trust. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED543222
q2 · i? · review · r1
The report's review of state waiver plans reports that "nearly half the states receiving waivers chose some version of the 'cut the gap in half' achievement goal," a framework the Education Trust developed from multi-state data analysis; the goal requires faster improvement from groups starting farthest behind.
"Nearly half the states receiving waivers chose some version of the "cut the gap in half" achievement goal. The idea for this goal originated at The Education Trust after extensive analysis of data from multiple states to identify rates of improvement and gap closing that meet the "ambitious but achievable" test."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- States used ESEA flexibility to move away from the 100 percent proficiency goal and target a narrower set of low-performing schools for support — a broader claim this one bears on
- In many NCLB waiver states, performance against improvement and gap-closing goals does not factor into school accountability ratings — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cut-gap-in-half-goal-adoption |
title |
Nearly half of waiver states adopted a 'cut the gap in half' achievement goal, while only Arizona chose 100 percent proficiency by 2020 |
description |
Nearly half of waiver states adopted a 'cut the gap in half' achievement goal, while only Arizona chose 100 percent proficiency by 2020 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
recheck_by |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — daria-hall-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.