Claims

CVE did not differentially affect dual-task costs, subjective task load, or non-learning secondary outcomes (motor symptoms, cognition, fitness, activity, sleep)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Dual-task costs at follow-up did not differ significantly between groups. → Wanner 2025 q2 i? Baseline-to-follow-up change scores revealed no significant group differences on motor symptoms, cognitive function, fitness, activity, and sleep, suggesting the CVE bout specifically enhanced motor learning. → Wanner 2025 (2)

Evidence

Wanner 2025

Wanner, P., Frisch, N., Rikus, S., Roig, M. & Steib, S. (2025). Cardiovascular exercise enhances motor learning across multiple sessions in people with Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled pilot trial. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00391-6

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Exploratory follow-up analysis of automaticity comparing single- and dual-task stabilometer blocks between EXE and REST groups. No significant difference was detected; equivalence was not tested and no effect size is printed.

"This analysis showed that d ual-task costs did not differ significantly between groups ( Supplementary Figure 10)."

Wanner 2025 (2)

Wanner, P., Frisch, N., Rikus, S., Roig, M. & Steib, S. (2025). Cardiovascular exercise enhances motor learning across multiple sessions in people with Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled pilot trial. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00391-6

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Exploratory comparison of baseline-to-follow-up change scores on motor symptoms, global cognitive function, physical fitness, activity level, and sleep behavior in the pilot trial. None differed between groups; the authors take this as specificity of the effect to motor learning.

"Change scores from baseline revealed no significant group differences , suggesting that the CVE bout specifically enhanced motor learning (Table 1)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cve-specificity-no-effect-secondary-outcomes
title CVE did not differentially affect dual-task costs, subjective task load, or non-learning secondary outcomes (motor symptoms, cognition, fitness, activity, sleep)
description CVE did not differentially affect dual-task costs, subjective task load, or non-learning secondary outcomes (motor symptoms, cognition, fitness, activity, sleep)
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — wanner-2025, wanner-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.