Daily academic failure predicts higher performance goals but not mastery goals the next morning¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i0 Academic failure predicted higher performance-avoidance (β = .069) and performance-approach (β = .072) goals the next morning, but not mastery goals, supporting Hypothesis 4; these small standardized coefficients were not robust in all sensitivity analyses. → Neubauer 2022
q2 i? In the sensitivity model with all random-effect covariances, failure no longer significantly predicted next-day performance-approach goals (β = .049) or performance-avoidance goals (β = .040). → Neubauer 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
Neubauer 2022¶
Neubauer, A. B., Schmidt, A., Schmiedek, F., & Dirk, J. (2022). Dynamic Reciprocal Relations of Achievement Goals with Daily Experiences of Academic Success and Failure: An Ambulatory Assessment Study. https://osf.io/gfvja/?view_only=b87fe179cf134471948726cb0e482a80
q2 · i0 · associational · r2
Across-day effects from the DSEM of 108 Grade 5 students. Failure predicted next-morning performance goals only; no mastery-goal effect was reported. The printed standardized coefficients are small (below d = 0.2 equivalent).
"Further, and supporting Hypothesis 4, academic failure was associated with higher performance-avoidance goals, β = .069 [.013, .123], and performance-approach goals, β = .072 [.014, .127], in the next morning."
Neubauer 2022 (2)¶
Neubauer, A. B., Schmidt, A., Schmiedek, F., & Dirk, J. (2022). Dynamic Reciprocal Relations of Achievement Goals with Daily Experiences of Academic Success and Failure: An Ambulatory Assessment Study. https://osf.io/gfvja/?view_only=b87fe179cf134471948726cb0e482a80
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Alternative Model 2 sensitivity analysis: both failure-to-performance-goal cross-lagged effects lost significance when all random effects were allowed to covary.
"Academic failure now no longer significantly predicted next day's performance-approach goals, β = .049 [-.008, .106], or performance-avoidance goals, β = .040 [-.018, .097]."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Achievement Goal Orientation — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Daily academic success predicts higher achievement goals the next morning, especially mastery goals — related
- Morning performance-avoidance goals predict same-day academic failure, though not robustly across sensitivity analyses — related
- Performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals were not meaningfully related to same-day academic success — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
daily-failure-raises-next-day-performance-goals |
title |
Daily academic failure predicts higher performance goals but not mastery goals the next morning |
description |
Daily academic failure predicts higher performance goals but not mastery goals the next morning |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — neubauer-2022, neubauer-2022-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.