Claims

Daily academic failure predicts higher performance goals but not mastery goals the next morning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i0 Academic failure predicted higher performance-avoidance (β = .069) and performance-approach (β = .072) goals the next morning, but not mastery goals, supporting Hypothesis 4; these small standardized coefficients were not robust in all sensitivity analyses. → Neubauer 2022 q2 i? In the sensitivity model with all random-effect covariances, failure no longer significantly predicted next-day performance-approach goals (β = .049) or performance-avoidance goals (β = .040). → Neubauer 2022 (2)

Evidence

Neubauer 2022

Neubauer, A. B., Schmidt, A., Schmiedek, F., & Dirk, J. (2022). Dynamic Reciprocal Relations of Achievement Goals with Daily Experiences of Academic Success and Failure: An Ambulatory Assessment Study. https://osf.io/gfvja/?view_only=b87fe179cf134471948726cb0e482a80

q2 · i0 · associational · r2

Across-day effects from the DSEM of 108 Grade 5 students. Failure predicted next-morning performance goals only; no mastery-goal effect was reported. The printed standardized coefficients are small (below d = 0.2 equivalent).

"Further, and supporting Hypothesis 4, academic failure was associated with higher performance-avoidance goals, β = .069 [.013, .123], and performance-approach goals, β = .072 [.014, .127], in the next morning."

Neubauer 2022 (2)

Neubauer, A. B., Schmidt, A., Schmiedek, F., & Dirk, J. (2022). Dynamic Reciprocal Relations of Achievement Goals with Daily Experiences of Academic Success and Failure: An Ambulatory Assessment Study. https://osf.io/gfvja/?view_only=b87fe179cf134471948726cb0e482a80

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Alternative Model 2 sensitivity analysis: both failure-to-performance-goal cross-lagged effects lost significance when all random effects were allowed to covary.

"Academic failure now no longer significantly predicted next day's performance-approach goals, β = .049 [-.008, .106], or performance-avoidance goals, β = .040 [-.018, .097]."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id daily-failure-raises-next-day-performance-goals
title Daily academic failure predicts higher performance goals but not mastery goals the next morning
description Daily academic failure predicts higher performance goals but not mastery goals the next morning
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — neubauer-2022, neubauer-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.