Claims

Blending outcomes showed no statistically significant effects of DaisyQuest in the Lonigan et al. (2003) trial

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Word blending, syllable/phoneme blending, and multiple-choice blending showed no statistically significant differences between the intervention and comparison groups. → DaisyQuest for Preschool Children 2006

Evidence

DaisyQuest for Preschool Children 2006

DaisyQuest for Preschool Children. (2006). What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc

q3 · i? · causal · r?

In the Lonigan et al. (2003) randomized controlled trial, the word blending outcome showed a mean difference of 1.35, effect size 0.33, marked "ns" (not statistically significant). Syllable/phoneme blending had an effect size of 0.01 and multiple-choice blending 0.26, both ns. Equivalence was not tested.

"Word blending 3–5 year olds 41 5.59 (4.10) 4.24 (3.97) 1.35 0.33 ns +13"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id daisyquest-blending-outcomes-not-significant
title Blending outcomes showed no statistically significant effects of DaisyQuest in the Lonigan et al. (2003) trial
description Blending outcomes showed no statistically significant effects of DaisyQuest in the Lonigan et al.
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2006
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — daisyquest-for-preschool-children-2006

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.