Claims

DaisyQuest matched teacher-delivered phonological awareness instruction but beat other instructional software in low-progress readers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2006 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In Mitchell and Fox (2001), DaisyQuest showed no statistical difference from teacher-delivered phonological awareness instruction on the total test score, with a negative (non-significant but substantively important) effect favoring the teacher-led group. → DaisyQuest 2006 q3 i? Against mathematics and drawing software, DaisyQuest showed statistically significant positive effects on the total test score. → DaisyQuest 2006 (2)

Evidence

DaisyQuest 2006

DaisyQuest. (2006). WWC Intervention Report: DaisyQuest. What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Randomized trial of 69 low-progress readers in three conditions. The report states "no statistical differences on the total test score" versus teacher-led instruction; WWC computed a negative, non-significant but substantively important effect favoring the teacher group.

"In the comparison between the DaisyQuest group and the teacher-delivered phonological awareness group, the authors found no statistical differences on the total test score."

DaisyQuest 2006 (2)

DaisyQuest. (2006). WWC Intervention Report: DaisyQuest. What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Same trial's second comparison against mathematics and drawing software controls. Statistically significant positive effects on the Phonological Awareness Test total score favoring DaisyQuest were found by authors and confirmed by WWC.

"In the comparison of DaisyQuest students and stu- dents using the other instructional technology, the study authors found, and the WWC confirmed, statistically significant positive effects on the total test score for the DaisyQuest group."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id daisyquest-versus-teacher-instruction-mixed
title DaisyQuest matched teacher-delivered phonological awareness instruction but beat other instructional software in low-progress readers
description DaisyQuest matched teacher-delivered phonological awareness instruction but beat other instructional software in low-progress readers
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2006
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — daisyquest-2006, daisyquest-2006-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.