Danmaku interaction is predominantly socio-emotional while discussion-board interaction tilts cognitive, and the tools share only four content categories¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? More than 70% of danmaku interaction fell in the socio-emotional dimension, while the discussion board showed slightly more cognitive than socio-emotional interaction; relationship development occurred only on the board, and cohesive responses and co-presence only in danmaku. → Bo Yang 2024

Evidence¶

Bo Yang 2024¶

Bo Yang. (2024). Combining Danmaku and Discussion Boards: Toward A Scalable and Sociable Environment for Mass Collaboration in MOOCs. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09426-3

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Quantitative content analysis coded all messages with a scheme built from Rourke et al.'s template plus a co-learning-presence category (Cohen's kappa 0.84 and 0.88). The analysis found "more than 70% of the interaction in danmaku is in the socio-emotional dimension," and that danmaku lacked relationship development while the board lacked cohesive responses and co-presence categories.

"more than 70% of the interaction in danmaku is in the socio-emotional dimension, while there is slightly more cognitive interaction than socio-emotional interaction on the discussion board."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• All discussion-board contributors sent significantly more text per person than all danmaku contributors in every shared category — related
• Danmaku hosts mass participation as a continuous collective flow while the discussion board divides learners into threaded small groups — related
• Mass participation formats in online communities depend on the tools used (Danmaku versus discussion board) — a broader claim this one bears on
• Danmaku learners engage in parasocial greetings and compliments to the instructor and seek co-learning presence, phenomena absent on the discussion board — related
• Danmaku primarily carries tacit knowledge sharing via personal experience while the discussion board carries explicit mathematical knowledge — related
• Danmaku questions elicit rapid co-answering and co-confusion, while discussion-board questions often go unanswered or support multi-round elaboration — related
• Interaction in danmaku and discussion boards spanned A3C levels from attendance through cooperation, with collaboration rare and limited to knowledge discussions — related