Claims

Districts use multiple forms of data—learning walks, state assessment items, dashboards, and diagnostics—to give teachers feedback and refine IM implementation over time

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Sycamore used learning walks and released MCAS items as data-driven professional learning, having teachers honestly check whether they had covered, skipped, or watered down material. → Hannan 2026 q2 i? Willow teachers used a common protocol to examine dashboard data and develop action plans that became the basis for classroom visits and collaborative hall chats. → Hannan 2026 (2)

Evidence

Hannan 2026

Hannan, M., Rainier, S., & Perry, R. (2026). Beyond curriculum adoption: What district leaders are saying about using Illustrative Mathematics. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED681318

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Spotlight interview: learning walks described as "120,000 percent not evaluative" supported vertical alignment, and the MCAS gut-check exercise connected curriculum implementation to state assessment outcomes and coherence.

"Sycamore’s curriculum coordinator described using questions that had been released from the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) as a form of data-driven professional learning, which she called a “gut check.”"

Hannan 2026 (2)

Hannan, M., Rainier, S., & Perry, R. (2026). Beyond curriculum adoption: What district leaders are saying about using Illustrative Mathematics. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED681318

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Spotlight interview: Willow's data-based learning cycle paired teacher action plans with principal building-level plans, forming the basis for classroom visits and collaborative "hall chats" after visits.

"Teachers used a common protocol to examine district dashboard data, diving into the prior year’s achievement test results; considering 3- to 4-year trends; and later reviewing results for particular standards, questions, and student subgroups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id data-use-supports-ongoing-hqim-implementation
title Districts use multiple forms of data—learning walks, state assessment items, dashboards, and diagnostics—to give teachers feedback and refine IM implementation over time
description Districts use multiple forms of data—learning walks, state assessment items, dashboards, and diagnostics—to give teachers feedback and refine IM implementation over time
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — hannan-2026, hannan-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.