Claims

The intervention did not change overall classroom instructional quality as measured by the CQELL Generic Lesson Elements and EL Support subscales

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? No differences were found between intervention and control teachers on CQELL Generic Lesson Elements or English Learner Support. → Leslie M. Babinski 2018

Evidence

Leslie M. Babinski 2018

Leslie M. Babinski, Steven J. Amendum, Steven E. Knotek, Marta Sánchez, Patrick Malone. (2018). Improving Young English Learners’ Language and Literacy Skills Through Teacher Professional Development: A Randomized Controlled Trial. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217732335

q3 · i? · causal · r2

ITT analysis of aggregated CQELL observations in the same teacher sample; parameter estimates were 0.06 for Generic Lesson Elements and 0.18 for EL Support, neither statistically significant. Equivalence was not formally tested; the authors interpret this as similar overall instructional quality.

"No differences were found between teachers in the intervention group and the control group on CQELL Generic Lesson Elements or EL Support, indicating that the overall quality of instruction was similar between the two groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.