The report examines whether retention rates of effective DCPS teachers changed after IMPACT began, including dismissal rates and school-level retention over time¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2017: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The report analyzes how many teachers met IMPACT dismissal criteria and were dismissed, compares overall retention before IMPACT (2008–2009) to the first three IMPACT years, and compares retention of the most effective teachers and of teachers at individual schools over time. → Elias Walsh 2014
Evidence¶
Elias Walsh 2014¶
Elias Walsh, Dallas Dotter. (2014). Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/longitudinal-analysis-of-the-effectiveness-of-dcps-teachers
q1 · i? · associational · r?
The report's first research question, as stated on the publication page, frames a longitudinal analysis of DCPS teacher retention under IMPACT, examining dismissals, overall retention from 2008–2009 onward, and retention of the most effective teachers. The page states the report will "compare the overall retention rate for teachers in the 2008–2009 school year" to later years. No findings are printed on this page.
"Have retention rates of effective teachers changed since the first year of IMPACT? Because teachers who earn an ineffective rating in one year or a minimally effective rating for two consecutive years are dismissed under IMPACT, overall retention rates may fall even as effective teachers are retained at higher rates."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The report compares the effectiveness of teachers entering and exiting DCPS since IMPACT against core teachers who remained from 2008–2009 through 2012–2013 — related
- The report measures how novice teachers' effectiveness changes with experience relative to veteran teachers' change in effectiveness — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dcps-impact-retention-effective-teachers-research-question |
title |
The report examines whether retention rates of effective DCPS teachers changed after IMPACT began, including dismissal rates and school-level retention over time |
description |
The report examines whether retention rates of effective DCPS teachers changed after IMPACT began, including dismissal rates and school-level retention over time |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
recheck_by |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — elias-walsh-2014 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.