Claims

Arithmetic deficits in adults with DD concentrate in mental calculation, arithmetical rules, and written calculation, with number comprehension and transcoding preserved

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3 · i0–i3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Adults with DD scored significantly lower than controls in total mental calculation (r = -0.614, p < 0.001) and total written calculation (r = -0.500, p < 0.001). → Vigna Giulia 2022 q3 i0 The two groups did not differ in number comprehension (r = -0.082, p = 0.278) or transcoding. → Vigna Giulia 2022 (2)

Evidence

Vigna Giulia 2022

Vigna Giulia, Ghidoni Enrico, Burgio Francesca, Danesin Laura, Angelini Damiano, Benavides-Varela Silvia, Semenza Carlo. (2022). Dyscalculia in Early Adulthood: Implications for Numerical Activities of Daily Living. Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12030373

q3 · i3 · associational · r2

Wilcoxon rank-sum comparison on the NADL Formal mental calculation subtest (26 DD vs 26 controls): DD mean 15.15 (SD 1.67) versus 17.23 (SD 1.14) for controls, effect size "−0.614", p < 0.001. Written calculation showed a similar significant difference (r = −0.500).

"Total mental calculation* 18 15.15 1.67 17.23 1.14 102.5 <0.001 −0.614 .000"

Vigna Giulia 2022 (2)

Vigna Giulia, Ghidoni Enrico, Burgio Francesca, Danesin Laura, Angelini Damiano, Benavides-Varela Silvia, Semenza Carlo. (2022). Dyscalculia in Early Adulthood: Implications for Numerical Activities of Daily Living. Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12030373

q3 · i0 · associational · r2

NADL Formal number comprehension subtest comparing 26 DD and 26 controls: DD mean 16.58 (SD 0.76) versus 16.69 (SD 0.62) for controls, effect size "−0.082", p = 0.278, Bayes factor 4.100. Transcoding likewise showed no significant group difference.

"Total number comprehension 17 16.58 0.76 16.69 0.62 313.0 0.278 −0.082 4.100"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id dd-adults-calculation-deficits-comprehension-preserved
title Arithmetic deficits in adults with DD concentrate in mental calculation, arithmetical rules, and written calculation, with number comprehension and transcoding preserved
description Arithmetic deficits in adults with DD concentrate in mental calculation, arithmetical rules, and written calculation, with number comprehension and transcoding preserved
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2022
recheck_by 2027
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — vigna-giulia-2022, vigna-giulia-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.