Claims

Adults with developmental dyscalculia are impaired in everyday numerical tasks, particularly time estimation, measure, and money usage

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-18 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Adults with DD scored significantly lower than controls on the NADL Informal Test total (r = -0.458, p = 0.001). → Vigna Giulia 2022 q3 i3 Adults with DD scored significantly lower than controls in money usage (r = -0.403, p = 0.003). → Vigna Giulia 2022 (2)

Evidence

Vigna Giulia 2022

Vigna Giulia, Ghidoni Enrico, Burgio Francesca, Danesin Laura, Angelini Damiano, Benavides-Varela Silvia, Semenza Carlo. (2022). Dyscalculia in Early Adulthood: Implications for Numerical Activities of Daily Living. Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12030373

q3 · i3 · associational · r2

Wilcoxon rank-sum comparison on the NADL Informal Test completed by 21 participants with DD and 26 controls. DD mean was 19.57 (SD 2.86) versus 21.62 (SD 1.10) for controls, effect size "−0.458", p = 0.001, one-sided.

"TOTAL INFORMAL * 23 19.57 2.86 21.62 1.10 130.5 0.001 −0.458 0.047"

Vigna Giulia 2022 (2)

Vigna Giulia, Ghidoni Enrico, Burgio Francesca, Danesin Laura, Angelini Damiano, Benavides-Varela Silvia, Semenza Carlo. (2022). Dyscalculia in Early Adulthood: Implications for Numerical Activities of Daily Living. Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12030373

q3 · i3 · associational · r2

Money usage subtest of the NADL Informal Test comparing DD and control participants; DD mean 6.95 (SD 0.92) versus 7.62 (SD 0.75) for controls, effect size "−0.403", p = 0.003. Bayes factors confirmed substantial evidence of H1 for money usage.

"Money * 8 6.95 0.92 7.62 0.75 156.5 0.003 −0.403 0.208"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id dd-adults-impaired-informal-nadl
title Adults with developmental dyscalculia are impaired in everyday numerical tasks, particularly time estimation, measure, and money usage
description Adults with developmental dyscalculia are impaired in everyday numerical tasks, particularly time estimation, measure, and money usage
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
source_checked 2026-10-18
recheck_by 2027
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — vigna-giulia-2022, vigna-giulia-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.