Claims

DDL favors higher-level learners and poses challenges of query analysis, intensive training, and corpus access

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Documented DDL challenges include difficulty of corpus query analysis, need for intensive training, difficulty of access to corpus search engines, and an advantage for higher-level over lower-level learners. → Rasikawati 2019

Evidence

Rasikawati 2019

Ira Rasikawati (2019). Corpus-Based Data-Driven Learning to Augment L2 Students’ Vocabulary Repertoire. International Dialogues on Education, 6(2), 83-98. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1245249

q2 · i? · review · r2

The article synthesizes challenges reported across studies (Liu & Lei 2017; Boulton 2009; others): difficulty of corpus query analysis, need for intensive training, paucity/difficulty of access to search engines, and that DDL "seems to favor more the higher-level learners than the lower ones" because complex authentic data demand analytical and linguistic skills.

"The DDL approach also seems to favor more the higher -level learners than the lower ones ( Liu & Lei, 2017; Boulton, 2009) as sufficient analytical and linguistic skills are necessary to cope with the complexity of the authentic data presented in the corpus query results"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.