Claims

DDL-based CL-inspired instruction led to greater learning gains and better retention of the vertical prepositions than traditional instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The DDL-based CL-inspired instruction group outperformed the traditional-instruction group in learning gains and in retention of the vertical prepositions. → Kilimci 2017

Evidence

Kilimci 2017

Kilimci, A. (2017). Integrating cognitive linguistics insights into data-driven learning: teaching vertical prepositions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 681-719. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1159243

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Comparison of the experimental group (DDL-based CL-inspired instruction, N=26) against the control group (traditional instruction, N=26) on post-test and delayed post-test performance two weeks after instruction ended. The article reports the DDL-based CL instruction "led to greater learning gains and better retenti on of knowledge"; no effect size or test statistic is printed for this contrast.

"yet the latter led to greater learning gains and better retenti on of knowledge"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.