Debiasing training helps reasoners intuit the correct solution rather than correct an erroneous intuition through deliberation¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? After intervention, decreases in "00" (incorrect at both stages) trial patterns were matched by increases in "11" (correct at both stages) patterns rather than "01" (deliberative correction) patterns. → Nina Franiatte 2024

Evidence¶

Nina Franiatte 2024¶

Nina Franiatte, Esther Boissin, Alexandra Delmas, Wim De Neys. (2024). Boosting Debiasing: Impact of Repeated Training on Reasoning. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101845

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Direction-of-change analysis (Bago & De Neys, 2017) on Session 1 conflict trials in the training group: "00" patterns dropped 43.9 points and "11" patterns rose 41.6 points, far more than in control (a 7.9-point drop and 8.4-point rise).

"the decrease of “00” patterns after the intervention led to an increase in “11” patterns rather than in “01” patterns (41.6 vs 2.1 points rise, following the intervention in the training group)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A single debiasing training session significantly increases both intuitive and deliberate accuracy on classic reasoning tasks compared to control — related