Claims

Students in steadily or sharply declining motivation trajectories showed lower STEM career aspirations and lower science grades than stable-trajectory peers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2–r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Sharp Decreasing students had the lowest STEM career aspirations in the sample, and Steady Decreasing, Transitory Decreasing, and Sharp Decreasing did not significantly differ from one another. → Wang 2016 q3 i? Steady Decreasing and Sharp Decreasing groups shared similar science grades, below the stable groups. → Wang 2016 (2)

Evidence

Wang 2016

Wang, Ming-Te; Chow, Angela; Degol, Jessica Lauren; Eccles, Jacquelynne Sue. (2016). Does Everyone's Motivational Beliefs about Physical Science Decline in Secondary School?: Heterogeneity of Adolescents' Achievement Motivation Trajectories in Physics and Chemistry. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0620-1

q3 · i? · associational · r3

Group comparison of twelfth-grade STEM career aspiration ratings across the seven trajectory groups; the declining groups clustered at the low end.

"Finally, Steady Decreasing, Transitory Decreasing, and Sharp Decreasing also did not significantly differ from one another, and Sharp Decreasing had the lowest STEM career aspirations out of the entire sample."

Wang 2016 (2)

Wang, Ming-Te; Chow, Angela; Degol, Jessica Lauren; Eccles, Jacquelynne Sue. (2016). Does Everyone's Motivational Beliefs about Physical Science Decline in Secondary School?: Heterogeneity of Adolescents' Achievement Motivation Trajectories in Physics and Chemistry. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0620-1

q3 · i? · associational · r2

School-record grade comparison across trajectory groups reported in the results; the discussion adds that decreasing groups had lower grades and advanced course enrollment than the Stable High group.

"Steady Decreasing and Sharp Decreasing also shared similar high school science grades, with Transitory Decreasing containing the lowest high school science grades among the sample."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id declining-motivation-lower-science-outcomes
title Students in steadily or sharply declining motivation trajectories showed lower STEM career aspirations and lower science grades than stable-trajectory peers
description Students in steadily or sharply declining motivation trajectories showed lower STEM career aspirations and lower science grades than stable-trajectory peers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — wang-2016, wang-2016-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.