Feedback probing for deeper conceptual understanding is reported to be particularly effective in classwide peer feedback, though cognitively more demanding¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Feedback that probed for deeper conceptual understanding was particularly effective, though cognitively more demanding. → Carolyn P. Rosé 2023

Evidence¶

Carolyn P. Rosé 2023¶

Carolyn P. Rosé, Sanna Järvelä. (2023). Enhancing student learning and achievement through orchestration of group processes and group composition. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18, 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09408-x

q2 · i? · qualitative · r?

The editorial reports, describing Tan et al.'s exploratory qualitative case study of feedback processes after a CSCL activity using the Spiral Model, that "feedback that probed for deeper conceptual understanding were particularly effective, though they were cognitively more demanding". No statistics are printed.

"Results showed that feedback that probed for deeper conceptual understanding were particularly effective, though they were cognitively more demanding."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In a case analysis, probing instructor feedback with required revise-and-resubmit moved one teacher candidate toward citing student evidence, though his progress was not linear and another candidate did not improve — related
• Students perceived online lab exercises as more effective when instructors were present online and used scaffolds and probes directing attention to key procedure aspects — related
• Dialogue evidence shows coach feedback induces genuine conceptual change, shifting the agent from misconception to conceptually correct explanation rather than superficial answer alignment — related