Claims

Mental health was operationalised through deficit- or symptom-based frameworks in 51 of 53 reviewed studies (96.2%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Only two of the 53 studies adopted positive-valence approaches to conceptualising mental health. → Zhandire 2026

Evidence

Zhandire 2026

Zhandire, T. T., Bakare-Fatungase, O. D., & Mkhize, N. (2026). Mental health, resilience, and academic outcomes among university students: a global scoping review with particular attention to African and Global South contexts. BMC Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05242-6

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's RQ1 thematic synthesis reports that "Mental health was conceptualised using deficit or symptom-based frameworks in 51 of 53 studies (96.2%)", instruments such as the DASS-21, PSS-10, and PHQ-9 developed in Western clinical populations.

"Mental health was conceptualised using deficit or symptom-based frameworks in 51 of 53 studies (96.2%). Only two adopted positive-valence approaches."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.