Tutoring center visits showed a delayed significant correlation with cumulative GPA in subsequent quarters¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2·i1small
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i1 For the 200740F cohort, fall quarter TC usage correlated significantly with spring quarter cumulative GPA (r=0.127, p=.021) and winter usage with the following fall GPA (r=0.149, p=.023); no significant correlation appeared for the 200740X cohort. → Cooper 2010
Evidence¶
Cooper 2010¶
Cooper, E. (2010). Tutoring Center Effectiveness: The Effect of Drop-In Tutoring. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ887303 doi:10.1080/10790195.2010.10850328
q2 · i1 · associational · r1
Correlational analysis of TutorTrac visit counts against cumulative GPA by quarter (Table 8). The article reports the correlation appeared one quarter later than expected, was "nearly significant" (p<.10) for the immediately following quarter, and was not significant for the 200740X cohort, attributed to smaller N.
"for the 200740F cohort, there was a significant correlation between fall quarter usage and spring quarter cumulative GP A (r=0.127, p=.021). Similarly, there was a positive, significant correlation between winter quarter TC usage and cumulative GP A the following fall quarter (r=0.149, p=.023)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Drop-in one-to-one tutorial attendees improved P1X-to-P1Y marks while the class average declined — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- High-use tutoring center visitors had significantly higher cumulative GPA than non-visitors, with the main difference between >10-visit and no-visit groups — related
- Freshmen who visited the tutoring center more than 10 times per quarter had statistically higher persistence rates than students who did not visit — related
- Only the 200740F high-use group showed a significantly higher rate of good academic standing compared to non-visitors — related
- The GPA advantage of high-use tutoring visitors held across math SAT score, high school GPA, ethnicity, and first-generation status — related
- Tutoring center visits usually showed no significant difference in individual course performance, and sometimes tutored students performed worse — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
delayed-correlation-visits-cumulative-gpa |
title |
Tutoring center visits showed a delayed significant correlation with cumulative GPA in subsequent quarters |
description |
Tutoring center visits showed a delayed significant correlation with cumulative GPA in subsequent quarters |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — cooper-2010 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.