Claims

Deliberation produces a substantial gender gap in voice and authority

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In deliberating groups, women show a substantial gap in voice and authority relative to men. → Christopher F. Karpowitz 2012

Evidence

Christopher F. Karpowitz 2012

Christopher F. Karpowitz, Tali Mendelberg, and Lee Shaker. (2012). Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation. American Political Science Review, Volume 106, Issue 3, pp. 533-547. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000329

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Experimental study with many deliberating groups, testing whether "men and women have equal levels of voice and authority in deliberation". The article reports "a substantial gender gap in voice and authority"; no effect size statistic is printed in the available text.

"We find a substantial gender gap in voice and authority, but as hypothesized, it disappears under unanimous rule and few women, or under majority rule and many women."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id deliberation-substantial-gender-gap-voice-authority
title Deliberation produces a substantial gender gap in voice and authority
description Deliberation produces a substantial gender gap in voice and authority
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-14
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — christopher-f-karpowitz-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.