Decisions participants volunteered were worded just as firmly as decisions the agent demanded, and revisions of earlier positions were rare¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · no dated study recorded · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Demanded decisions averaged 4.31 in certainty and spontaneous ones 4.35, with weakly worded commitments equally rare (10% vs. 9%); only 115 of 6,491 participant turns revised an earlier position. → demanded-vs-spontaneous
Evidence¶
demanded-vs-spontaneous¶
Subigya K. Nepal, Serena Soh, Noah Vinoya, SoHyun Park, Mahnaz Roshanaei, and Gabriella Harari. 2027. Faithful Where It Can Be Checked: Auditing a Reflection Agent Against Its System Prompt in a Randomized Trial. In Proceedings of CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '27). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19635 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.19635
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Study 2 comparison of agent-prompted versus participant-initiated decisions using the validated certainty ratings. No statistically significant difference in firmness was found; equivalence was not tested. Most revisions came in the first activity without a preceding demand.
"We also compared decisions the agent asked for with decisions participants offered on their own, and found no difference in how firmly they were worded: demanded decisions averaged 4.31 in certainty and spontaneous ones 4.35"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- When participants declined to decide and the agent asked again, the resulting commitments were the weakest in the corpus — related
- Contrary to expectations, agent-led reflection sessions typically ended with participants sounding more certain of their plans than when they started — related
- The agent's praise was indiscriminate affirmation: validation followed about half of participant turns regardless of what the participant said — related
- The agent behavior linked to the trial's worse career outcomes was repeated demands to decide: participants pressed most ended most doubtful — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
demanded-versus-spontaneous-decisions-no-firmness-difference |
title |
Decisions participants volunteered were worded just as firmly as decisions the agent demanded, and revisions of earlier positions were rare |
description |
Decisions participants volunteered were worded just as firmly as decisions the agent demanded, and revisions of earlier positions were rare |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — demanded-vs-spontaneous |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.