Experimental group post-test speaking scores reached the high category while control group scores stayed in the average category¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The experimental group's mean rose from 2.01 (average category) at pre-test to 4.01 (high category) at post-test, while the control group moved from 2.07 to 2.7, remaining in the average category. → Husnu 2018

Evidence¶

Husnu 2018¶

Muhammad Husnu. (2018). Demonstration Technique to Improve Vocabulary and Grammar Element in Teaching Speaking at EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 11(2). http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n2p26

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive statistics from the Findings section of the true-experimental study: experimental means 2.01 to 4.01, control means 2.07 to 2.7. The article reports the experimental post-test as "high category" and the control post-test as average category. Standard deviations of pre- and post-test were 3.47 and 3.72.

"the mean score of experimental group in the pre-test was 2.01 and in the post-test was 4.01. Meanwhile, the mean score of control group in pre-test was 2.07 and in the post-test was 2.7"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Descriptively, the experimental group reached a good achievement category in speaking and writing while the control group reached only average — related
• Within the experimental group, achievement rose significantly from pre-test to post-test, while the control group's gain was not statistically significant — related
• Demonstration technique significantly improves the vocabulary and grammar element of speaking in EFL learners — a broader claim this one bears on