Claims

The group taught to design graphic organisers (Experimental group B) scored statistically higher than both the prepared-organiser group and the control group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Scheffe post hoc comparisons showed Experimental group B's mean score was statistically higher than Experimental group A's and the Control group's. → Josiah Owolabi & Tobiloba Faith Adaramati 2015

Evidence

Josiah Owolabi & Tobiloba Faith Adaramati 2015

Josiah Owolabi & Tobiloba Faith Adaramati. (2015). Effects of Graphic Organiser on Students' Achievement in Algebraic Word Problems. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.5. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083649

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Scheffe post hoc multiple comparison of post-test mean scores across the three treatment groups (Table 5). Differences between Control and Experimental group B (mean difference 10.114, sig. .003) and between Experimental group A and B (7.066, sig. .038) were significant at the 0.05 level.

"Specifically, the mean score of Experiment al group B is statistically higher than those of Experimental group A and the Control Group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.