The group taught to design graphic organisers (Experimental group B) scored statistically higher than both the prepared-organiser group and the control group¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Scheffe post hoc comparisons showed Experimental group B's mean score was statistically higher than Experimental group A's and the Control group's. → Josiah Owolabi & Tobiloba Faith Adaramati 2015
Evidence¶
Josiah Owolabi & Tobiloba Faith Adaramati 2015¶
Josiah Owolabi & Tobiloba Faith Adaramati. (2015). Effects of Graphic Organiser on Students' Achievement in Algebraic Word Problems. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.5. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083649
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Scheffe post hoc multiple comparison of post-test mean scores across the three treatment groups (Table 5). Differences between Control and Experimental group B (mean difference 10.114, sig. .003) and between Experimental group A and B (7.066, sig. .038) were significant at the 0.05 level.
"Specifically, the mean score of Experiment al group B is statistically higher than those of Experimental group A and the Control Group."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.