Claims

When body size at fourteen and period of rapid growth are considered, heavy or tall early developers rank better in scholarship than late developers, and light late developers rank better than light early or medium developers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1917 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Heavy boys developing early, average boys developing at medium periods, and light boys developing late rank well in scholarship in eight cases and poor in three; heavy-late and light-early-or-medium boys rank well in no case and poor in four. → Stewart 1917 q2 i? For height, tall boys increasing rapidly at early or medium periods and average boys at medium periods do good work in six cases and poor in three; short boys of medium or late period do well in one case and poorly in six. → Stewart 1917 (2)

Evidence

Stewart 1917

Stewart, S. F. (1917). A study of physical growth and school standing of boys. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070804

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Chart XII classifies the twenty-nine boys by weight at fourteen years and period of most rapid weight increase against scholarship standing. The complementary group is described: heavy boys developing late and light boys developing early or medium "rank well in no case and poor in four cases."

"Heavy boys who develop early, average boys who develop at medium periods, and light boys who develop late, rank well in scholarship in eight cases and poor in three cases."

Stewart 1917 (2)

Stewart, S. F. (1917). A study of physical growth and school standing of boys. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070804

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Chart XIII classifies the same boys by height at fourteen and period of rapid height increase. Short boys of medium or late period do well in one case and poorly in six; boys with indefinite rapid-growth periods do well in four cases and average in one.

"Tall boys who increase rapidly at early or medium periods and average boys who increase rapidly at medium periods are doing good work in six cases and poor work in three cases."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id development-stage-conditions-scholarship-relation
title When body size at fourteen and period of rapid growth are considered, heavy or tall early developers rank better in scholarship than late developers, and light late developers rank better than light early or medium developers
description When body size at fourteen and period of rapid growth are considered, heavy or tall early developers rank better in scholarship than late developers, and light late developers rank better than light early or medium de...
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1917
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — stewart-1917, stewart-1917-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.