Claims

The learner's developmental level conditions the outcomes of interactional input

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 1999 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The developmental level of the learner was a considered factor in the developmental outcomes of interaction. → Alison Mackey 1999

Evidence

Alison Mackey 1999

Alison Mackey. (1999). INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT: An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004027

q3 · i? · causal · r?

From the abstract of the pretest-posttest study of question formation in ESL: the study considered both active participation and the learner's developmental level as factors in developmental outcomes. No effect size or subgroup statistic is printed in the available text.

"Active participation ininteraction and the developmental level of the learner were considered."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id developmental-level-conditions-interaction-outcomes
title The learner's developmental level conditions the outcomes of interactional input
description The learner's developmental level conditions the outcomes of interactional input
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1999
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-14
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — alison-mackey-1999

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.