Dialogic learning produces a more positive effect on value-loaded critical-thinking competences than non-dialogic learning in pre-vocational secondary Biology¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Compared to the non-dialogic condition, the dialogic learning condition resulted in a more positive effect on students' critical-thinking competences in terms of generative fluency of reasoning. → Frijters 2008
q3 i? The dialogic condition also yielded a more positive effect on the quality of students' value orientation. → Frijters 2008
Evidence¶
Frijters 2008¶
Frijters, S., ten Dam, G., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2008). Effects of dialogic learning on value-loaded critical thinking. Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 66-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.001
q3 · i? · causal · r?
A published experimental study in pre-vocational secondary education compared a Dialogic and a Non-Dialogic lesson series for value-loaded critical thinking in Biology. The article reports the dialogic condition showed "a more positive effect on the critical-thinking competences of the students"; no effect sizes are printed in the available text.
"The results indicated that the dialogic learning condition, compared to the non-dialogic, resulted in a more positive effect on the critical-thinking competences of the students, both in terms of generative fluency of reasoning and quality of value orientation."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Critical Thinking — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Gains in critical-thinking competences from dialogic lessons did not come at the expense of Biology subject-matter knowledge — related
- GenAI-assisted education produces significantly higher higher-order thinking abilities than non-GenAI approaches (g = 0.72) — a broader claim this one bears on
- Argumentation Improves Reasoning — related
- The TEFA-T model improves students' critical thinking skills on all measured indicators compared with conventional instruction — related
- Cognitive offloading to generative AI is associated with reduced learner engagement, lower critical thinking, and lower-quality reasoning — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dialogic-learning-improves-value-loaded-critical-thinking |
title |
Dialogic learning produces a more positive effect on value-loaded critical-thinking competences than non-dialogic learning in pre-vocational secondary Biology |
description |
Dialogic learning produces a more positive effect on value-loaded critical-thinking competences than non-dialogic learning in pre-vocational secondary Biology |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2008 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — frijters-2008 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.