Claims

The evidence base for dialogic reading with children with disabilities is small, with no qualifying studies in six other outcome domains

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Of 59 reviewed studies, only two met WWC evidence standards (52 students total), and no studies meeting standards examined cognitive development, literacy, math, social-emotional, functional, or physical outcomes. → Dialogic Reading 2010

Evidence

Dialogic Reading 2010

Dialogic Reading. (2010). WWC Intervention Report, What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/136

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

WWC review covering seven outcome domains; Appendix A5 records two studies, six schools/centers, 52 students, and an extent-of-evidence rating of small for communication/language competencies, with zero studies in each of the other six domains.

"The WWC considers the extent of evidence for dialogic reading to be small for communication and language competen- cies for children with disabilities. No studies that meet WWC evidence standards with or without reservations examined the effectiveness of dialogic reading for children with disabilities in the domains of cognitive development, literacy, math competen- cies, social-emotional development and behavior, functional abilities, or physical well-being."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id dialogic-reading-small-evidence-base-disabilities
title The evidence base for dialogic reading with children with disabilities is small, with no qualifying studies in six other outcome domains
description The evidence base for dialogic reading with children with disabilities is small, with no qualifying studies in six other outcome domains
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2010
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — dialogic-reading-2010

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.